Quantcast

By Lisa Frank on Nickelodeon's Diversity "Problem" Is That It Likes Diversity

I'm also pissed that he said Clarissa Explains it All didn't matter and wasn't a huge hit? Clarissa mattered A LOT!

Also speaking of John Cho standing around and looking attractive, is Selfie worth watching? Maybe in the next Star Trek, they can lock Kirk in a storage closet, and Sulu can become the Captain?

Posted on October 7, 2014 at 10:49 am 2

By adriana on Nickelodeon's Diversity "Problem" Is That It Likes Diversity

"Mindy Kaling would be the Shonda Rhimes, Shonda Rhimes would be the Aaron Sorkin, and Aaron Sorkin would be just some dude watching from home."

What a beautiful world.

Posted on October 7, 2014 at 10:29 am 6

By Jaya on Nickelodeon's Diversity "Problem" Is That It Likes Diversity

I love that his whole argument is "well, why does the character have to be [minority]." Well, why do they have to be white? If it's all arbitrary, then make it diversely arbitrary! White is not the default uuuuugh

Posted on October 7, 2014 at 9:44 am 5

By Pela on How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love My Second Wedding

Oh my god thank you. This is exactly what I needed to hear - “Go, because you want to,” writes Strayed, “Because wanting to leave is enough.”

Posted on June 30, 2014 at 12:56 pm 4

By wee_ramekin on The Sexual History of Jared Sabbagh, Part 3

@lizardjellybean Well, and beyond the overconfidence in one's own immortality, the issue that I can't get away from within this tale is that his blasé attitude extended to the sexual partners he had after contracting HIV.

I mean, he said that he was in denial about having HIV, and I can understand that. But I can't understand or be okay with the fact that between when he contracted HIV and when he got tested, he probably had unprotected sex. He adds a lot of caveats to his account of how he was initially infected that he might have used as reasons not to disclose his possible positive status while engaging in unprotected sex after infection ("...it would've been fine if I hadn't fucked him for so long, or if he wasn’t freshly positive, meaning his viral load was really high."), but how does he know that the men he was barebacking it with didn't have cuts somewhere, or weren't immunocompromised, or or or? Like, just because you are fatalistic about dying from AIDS doesn't mean that you're absolved from telling your partners "Oh yeah, I fuck HIV-positive guys without condoms and I haven't been tested in a few months!". Maybe he did that, but methinks not. And maybe there is a guy out there who is HIV-positive now because of his behavior.

I appreciate that this is Jared's tale, and toward all the rest of it, I'm happy to have a "You do you" attitude. It's a fascinating read, and I enjoyed hearing his reflections about his experience. But in an earlier chapter, he says that his view on sex was "Fuck it man: harm none, go nuts, do what you want, the only thing that's gross about this is feeling ashamed". Having unprotected sex after knowing that there is a possibility that you were infected with HIV is the exact opposite of "harm none", and it made me very uncomfortable to read about it.

Posted on September 12, 2013 at 1:16 pm 5

By lizardjellybean on The Sexual History of Jared Sabbagh, Part 3

@cee See, now, I don't really see this as the same thing. I think a woman feeling the inevitability of rape, this thing outside her own control, maybe correlates more strongly to the idea of... I don' t know, I guess a hate crime? Someone being beaten up because they're gay? Because that's something outside of the person's control, and terrifying, and you live your life in a way that ignores that possibility, because you HAVE to. But having lots of really risky, unprotected sex with people you KNOW are positive, I don't think we can put that in the same category. Those are risks he took himself, that aren't inherent to being a gay man, as far as I can see it. Maybe I'm speaking out of turn, but, especially when you are AWARE that your sexual partner is positive, it smacks of an over-confident belief in your own immortality to not take precautions.

Posted on September 12, 2013 at 10:29 am 5

By j-i-a on The Sexual History of Jared Sabbagh, Part 3

@Myrtle I'm not sure why this would scare any woman out of having sex ever again, unless she were within a community where the HIV rate was similar and were willingly engaging in comparable behaviors without ever having thought about the risks. To explain the other point you bring up, I thought this interview had a place here because I found it a compelling story and generally think of this readership as one that is interested in complex stories that sometimes have nothing to do with our own--I also think Jared's life has been full of things that could resonate with anyone that can't comprehend actually having sex with 1000 people (within my body, I certainly can't): the idea that your inherent sexual desire is wrong, the desire to do wild things along with the shame of doing them, the way strange support communities can crop up at different times in your growing-up life, the super-real need to define for yourself what "self-destructive" means, etc.

Posted on September 12, 2013 at 8:45 am 10

By Laughable Walrus on The Sexual History of Jared Sabbagh, Part 3

@Myrtle See, that's interesting to me, because that's not how I experienced this. Sure, Jared's way more extreme than I ever will be, but I've always been very sexual (in the "masturbating so early I can't remember when I started" way - I didn't actually start having sex with partners until I was almost out of my teens). I can identify with a lot of the motivations if not the acts, and reading Jared's story helps me put my own in a context where my own desires to have a lot of sex doesn't feel so freakish. (And yeah, it really reinforced my desire to be as safe as possible while doing it.) So as a woman, I appreciated this being posted on a women's website.

Posted on September 12, 2013 at 1:12 am 4

By apples and oranges on Your Breakfast Has Been Lying to You

Most mornings I hate eating breakfast (aka DON'T eat breakfast) because my stomach takes like 2-3 hours longer to wake up than the rest of me. Food makes me feel sick if I haven't been up for a while. And Science can do what it wants, I'm not eating until I feel hungry.

Posted on September 10, 2013 at 2:02 pm 4

By leonstj on Your Breakfast Has Been Lying to You

My doctor, a dietician friend, and a personal trainer friend have all recently informed me with some variation of "Look, dude. You're not trying to be a professional athlete. Just eat healthy naturey food that makes you feel good, everything else is inconsequential for normal people."

Posted on September 10, 2013 at 2:01 pm 7