On The Cups Pie
Where are the peanut butter cups?! They are the most relevant of all.
This might be the best comment section on a Hairpin piece ever. Well played, Sarah Miller. Also, thank YOU JonathOn Gilbert@facebook for mansplaining that this satire is in fact a FORGERY and explaining (with proper TMZ grammar) that Ned just wants that nice J-Law girl to get a hold of herself before she ends up OD'ing in a hotel bathroom. I'm sure Jennifer Lawrence, who totally read both this article and your comment, is grateful for and appreciative of your concern and the time you took to explain it to her (and us) in simple terms so our ladybrains could understand. You're a national treasure.
@msu OMG, I had to log in for the first time in AGES to tell you that although I enjoyed this article, this comment (including the part where you admit that you don't know Ned) made me cackle loudly in my apartment. You are a delight.
@Michelle H. Sellars@facebook I have been in the "It was Marty" camp off and on--not in the sense that I want to be him, but in the sense that I feel like he's implicated in it. Having read the Pizzolato interview on Buzzfeed, I realize that Pizzolato on some level wants you to think that it at least could be Marty. Marty is implicated by his inability to conceive of women as fully fledged, autonomous human beings. This contrasts with his efforts to solve the crime, which sort of redeem him, along with the fact that his ideas about women have led him to a place of such deep (and not undeserved) unhappiness. So I mean... yeah, it kind of is Marty, in the sense these crimes take place in a world where Marty's view of women is sadly common among men and enables these kinds of crimes to go unchecked. But is it Marty who's actually killing women? Nope.
@madeleineld I don't know that I agree that the Larson books feature that much of women being rescued by men. In fairness, it's been a while since I've read them, but I think part of what I found appealing about them was that Salander consistently rescues herself against a backdrop of disbelief or unconcern from men, especially male authority figures. I also felt like the heavy plot emphasis in the second and third books on human trafficking was a direct commentary on this same issue; the idea that these women are invisible and therefore disposable. I thought it also did a good job of showing that men who seem perfectly ordinary and who are harmless in certain contexts can be sadistic in others. That's not to say that I agree with the depiction of all men who attack women as profoundly twisted (they are depressingly ordinary and common), or that I think the novels are flawless feminist manifestos, I just don't know that that particular critique is accurate.
The book is highly dramatized, of course, but I felt like Larson managed to get at some interesting points, especially the isolation that women who seek their own autonomy face and the challenge of balancing a desire for power against a desire to be feminine.
I think for me, it's kind of a given that Dora Lang would be a prostitute. There's a sexual component to the killings, and beyond that, I think it reflects real life killers like the Green River Killer, who was able to carry on for a very long time specifically because he targeted prostitutes. It's part and parcel of Marty's concern about purity; it's Rust who's really interested in keeping the Lang case. It's Rust who spots the "Have You Seen Me" and starts looking into women being kidnapped/murdered. Marty only gets really emotionally involved when the victims are young children. He engages in violence, but Marty's violence is directed primarily at the men with whom women violate their purity; most of his violence with his mistress is directed at her date, the same way the violence of his response to his daughter is directed at the young men involved. He sees women as essentially passive, capable only of reaction; that's what innocence is in his mind. It's what makes him go after what Rust calls "crazy pussy"; those women pursue him, but in his worldview they pursue him as a reaction to his maleness and masculinity. Even with Maggie, his rage is directed at Rust. It's not so much that Marty hates women, it's that he dismisses them as actors. I see that as the sort of central tension between Rust and Marty; Rust's rage at the CID is wrapped up not only in the complicity of the organization in the conspiracy, but in the larger social conspiracy to dismiss the damage done and being done to women. On some level, he realizes Marty is part of this, but at the same time, he can't go it alone.
On the flip side, I would throw out there that I think Maggie is the most complete character on the show. She is the one who knows what she wants and creates a plan and acts. What does that mean in the context of the narrative? I don't know. I guess we'll find out Sunday.
First of all, thank you AHP for this fantastic series--I'm really enjoying following it.
Second, Allie, I cannot tell you how much I enjoy your blog. I really hope that when Suri is grown she looks back at your tumblr and is delighted to have such a hilarious and on point alter ego.
I... might be in love with Vin Diesel? Like, the more I learn about him, the more I want to invite him over to watch LOTR and make out.
I don't know what keeps you all going back to Downton. I quit after the end of the third season, and I haven't looked back. I was a little tired of the characters, but the end of season 3 just pushed the plot into the land of ridiculous. It's becoming a PBS version of Passions.
"She was like the sad, over-dressed girl crying in the bathroom at the party filled with perky-breasted freshmen." PERFECTION.
So glad to have a new SOCH, and AHP, you are KILLING it in the alt-text!
Also, I want you to know that I finally watched Sunset Boulevard like three months ago and I have not shut up about it since.
OH AND AND AND...
I was watching TCM and they showed two movies back to back with Rita Hayworth and Joan Crawford playing the same character, and it was amazing.