By Rookie (not the magazine) (not that there's anything wrong with that) on NYT Magazine's Hillary Cover Makes No Sense: A Brief Scientific Chat
@ru_ri It reminds me of that orange that has a face on it?
Also, it might be the least flattering photo/depiction I've ever seen of a politician.
@Gef the Talking Mongoose OMG you read my mind - the Mighty Boosh was the very first thing that came to mind when I saw that abomination of a Hillary-planet. Well done.
I just did an illustration for the NY Times (it doesn't run until next month). When they accepted it, I was, like, "Oh, phew, they like it; it's good."
Now I'm not so sure. :(
@j-i-a : It's particularly delightful because my reaction was the same as with all mass-media science gaffes : science-nerd rage followed by resignation that "nobody cares that this makes no sense, so best not to get worked up about it." So seeing this cheered me right up, because YES IT DOES MATTER THAT NOTHING ORBITS PLANETS (except moons and other natural satellites) AND OTHER REAL PEOPLE SHARE MY FEELINGS.
I definitely agree that giving up shampoo can be awesome for some hair, but I have one quibble. Vinegar and baking soda both act as mild bleaching agents, so any color change is most likely due to that rather than shampoo darkening hair. I tried it when I was younger, and one of the reasons I switched to cowashing instead was because it was slowly lightening my (black brown) hair to a shade I did not like.
"When you use baking soda (a base) and then apple-cider vinegar (an acid), your scalp’s pH remains stable and its oil production stays low."
I hate to be that person but a chemist friend told me that this isn't actually true. Because they're going on one after the other (as opposed to mixed together which would cancel them out) what's happen is your hair is swinging from basic to acidic and it's actually not super great for your hair.
The big reason why people find their hair gets soft and fluffy from this method is because the baking soda is so alkaline that it starts to break down the bonds in your hair.
If it's working for you, obviously, you do you, but if you worry about the above or find in a few years that your hair is getting a little damaged you might want to switch to some sort of less basic substance (maybe cornstarch?) and use a slightly more diluted vinegar mix.
This is really interesting. You are very pretty and have nice thick hair, but I have to say, the after pic is not selling me on this.
I actually think the engagement chicken story makes some sense. Women who make engagement chicken and have in mind that it is engagement chicken and they would like to get engaged "because of it" are simultaneously women who are in a serious enough relationship that they envision that engagement is something that may feasibly occur. People in a serious enough relationship that engagement may be feasibly envisioned are likely to . . . get engaged in the near future. Voilà!
So... number one is how I always make chicken. WHY HAS NO ONE PROPOSED TO ME?
More worryingly, has the art of cooking chicken become so obscure that a simple, effective method is considered so out-of-the-ordinary the dude will marry you? HOW WERE YOU COOKING CHICKEN BEFORE?
I thought this was going to be about when you're in a relationship for years and years and you both vaguely know you'll probably get married one day but neither of you wants to pull the trigger and the person who finally does propose loses the game but you're both happy anyway.